Hamlet And Othelia Essays - Characters In Hamlet,

Hamlet And Othelia Ophelia, in this tragedy many see her as just Hamlet's lover, a character who is selfish in not helping Hamlet when in need, or just a psycho lover with a lot of problems. What if the story was twisted so that the play wasn't a tragedy and actually turned into a love story due to Ophelia? This is how I would have written it if I were William Shakespeare. Ophelia who was Hamlet's love in the play would have recognized the reason for Hamlet's madness, taken the situation in to her own hands in order to stay with Hamlet, and would have solved all the problems that makes this play a tragedy. When Hamlet first realizes who has killed his father he starts to plan his revenge. In the beginning of the play Ophelia recognizes that Hamlet is having problems and forms an opinion, which hints to hamlet being mad or insane. She doesn't really pay attention to Hamlet's real needs and purpose for being upset. What should have happened is. Hamlet would of let Ophelia know the truth about Claudius so that Ophelia would have a better understanding of where Hamlet is coming from. By recognizing this first, many problems in the original tragedy wouldn't have taken place. With Ophelia aware of the murderer, she takes matters into her own hands due to her love for Hamlet. Secretly she kills Claudius, but the cause for his death is unknown. Hamlet is the only person besides Ophelia who knows who the culprit is. This is kept a secret between the two and their love is what keeps the secret from getting out. All the little tragedies within the original tragedy are what make it such a great tragedy, but if I were to make this into a love story these wouldn't be necessary. By eliminating Claudius secretly. Hamlet's revenge is no longer necessary. Hamlet does not end up killing Polonius in his mother's quarters. Ophelia has no reason to go insane, Laertes seeks no revenge on Hamlet, and Claudius is not there to help get rid of Hamlet. Without all of these situations in the play Hamlet becomes king and is able to give his love to the people of his kingdom, and Ophelia. Hamlet and Ophelia are not King and Queen and the King Hamlet, the Ghost, is content with the present. These events are what make it a love story instead of tragedy and everyone lives happily ever after. I chose Ophelia to be the reason why Hamlet is still alive because all the other characters are recognized more often in the play, and I feel that Ophelia would be the person least suspected for the murder of Claudius. By having her recognize Hamlets problems and goals, taking them into her own hands for Hamlet, and being the reason why all the other little scandals and deaths don't take place, this play can now be called a love story. Hamlet does not die and there for it cannot be called a tragedy, and this play is still a great play because it has love, mystery, and because William Shakespeare wrote it. Ophelia, in this tragedy many see her as just Hamlet's lover, a character who is selfish in not helping Hamlet when in need, or just a psycho lover with a lot of problems. What if the story was twisted so that the play wasn't a tragedy and actually turned into a love story due to Ophelia? This is how I would have written it if I were William Shakespeare. Ophelia who was Hamlet's love in the play would have recognized the reason for Hamlet's madness, taken the situation in to her own hands in order to stay with Hamlet, and would have solved all the problems that makes this play a tragedy. When Hamlet first realizes who has killed his father he starts to plan his revenge. In the beginning of the play Ophelia recognizes that Hamlet is having problems and forms an opinion, which hints to hamlet being mad or insane. She doesn't really pay attention to Hamlet's real needs and purpose for being upset. What should have happened is. Hamlet would of let Ophelia know the truth about Claudius so that Ophelia would have a better understanding of where Hamlet is coming from. By recognizing this first, many problems in the original tragedy wouldn't have taken place. With Ophelia aware of the murderer, she takes matters into her own hands due to her love for Hamlet. Secretly she

Education Essays - Educational Research, More Than Twenty Years

Education Essays - Educational Research, More Than Twenty Years Education I am one of these people they generally refer to as a "mature student". It is too bad that this term doesn't mean what suggests, that I study in a more mature way than people who have not been out of school as long as I have. It simply means that I have not been in a formal classroom for quite a while in my case for more than twenty years. There are advantages and disadvantages to having this gap in one's education. One advantage is that it does give me some perspective to see that education has undergone some changes since those long ago years when I was in school. Two of these changes in curriculum and a change in teachers. The attitude to class meterial is a lot more flexible now than when I was in school. I remember thtat in high school history cource which I took there was only one textbook and that was to be memorized. Anything outside the book was "off topic", and we had to get back to learning "the facts" because that was what the exam was going to be about. In the history class which I am taking now we don't even have aaa book. The teacher brings in material from many souces magazines, newspaper, journals and government publications. The final exam is no longer the most important thing. It is the papers we write and our participation in class which is impoertant. Curriculum has certainly changed a great deal over twenty years. Another change which I have noted is the change in teachers. Teachers today seem much more approachable than twenty years ago. Today's teachers dress in a more casual and relaxed way. They don'tt drop dead in their tracks if you call them by their first name. Most important, they seem to have actually admitted that they didn't know the answer to a question which a student asked. They often say, however, that they know where thay cand find the answer. This willingness to be a learner alonng with the students is new to me. Teachers today are frequently partners in the learning process. The teacher of twenty years ago was more interested in maintaining his authority. Maybe I ame overgeneralizing about the changes which have occurred in the Canadian education system; nevertheless, I am convinced that both the content of courses and the teachers themselves have changed immensely. The system still isn't perfect, but as an adult student I am convinced that it is basically better.